Papers with Indian English
Predicting the Target Word of Game-playing Conversations using a Low-Rank Dialect Adapter for Decoder Models (2025.naacl-short)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing work proposes dialect adaptation for encoder models or encoder-decoder models. |
| Approach: | They propose to use MD-3 to combine task adapters and dialect adapters to decoder models using a masked word game-playing conversation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed architecture outperforms baselines on Indian English and Nigerian English on a masked conversation with two models. |
Towards Speech to Speech Machine Translation focusing on Indian Languages (2023.eacl-demo)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | SSMT is a web application for translating videos from one language to another by cascading multiple language modules. |
| Approach: | They introduce an SSMT pipeline for translating videos from one language to another by cascading multiple language modules. |
| Outcome: | The proposed system can get 3.5+ MOS score for English to Hindi using human intervention. |
Multi-VALUE: A Framework for Cross-Dialectal English NLP (2023.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Current systems that focus on standard American English are not dialect invariant . current systems focus on a single dialect, which results in performance discrepancies . |
| Approach: | They propose a resource for evaluating and achieving English dialect invariance . they stress test question answering, machine translation, and semantic parsing . |
| Outcome: | The proposed system is based on a rule-based translation system spanning 50 English dialects and 189 unique linguistic features. |
Dialetto, ma Quanto Dialetto? Transcribing and Evaluating Dialects on a Continuum (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent work on dialect variation in NLP treats dialects as discrete categories . dialect variation is a focus of increasing interest in the field . |
| Approach: | They examine performance differences between Italian dialects by incorporating performance data from different regions of the world. |
| Outcome: | The results show that performance disparities are due to dialects that are more similar to the standard variety. |
Learning to Recognize Dialect Features (2021.naacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | linguistics do not characterize dialects as simple categories, but as collections of correlated features. |
| Approach: | They propose two multitask learning approaches based on pretrained transformers to detect dialect features in speech and text. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models learn to recognize many features with high accuracy on 22 dialect features of Indian English. |
Geographically-Balanced Gigaword Corpora for 50 Language Varieties (2020.lrec-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing corpora of text corpors over-represent inner-circle varieties from the US and UK . this paper uses country-level population demographics to correct implicit geographic and demographic biases . |
| Approach: | They propose to use country-level population demographics to correct geographic biases . they use a population-based sampling technique to remove geographic bias from gigaword corpora . |
| Outcome: | The proposed corpus family removes geographic biases by comparing the population-based sampling with the baseline corpus. |
IndicNLPSuite: Monolingual Corpora, Evaluation Benchmarks and Pre-trained Multilingual Language Models for Indian Languages (2020.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Divyanshu Kakwani, Anoop Kunchukuttan, Satish Golla, Gokul N.C., Avik Bhattacharyya, Mitesh M. Khapra, Pratyush Kumar
| Challenge: | In this paper, we present NLP resources for 11 major Indian languages . distributional representations are the cornerstone of modern NLP, authors say . |
| Approach: | They introduce NLP resources for 11 major Indian languages from two major language families . monolingual corpora contains 8.8 billion tokens across all 11 languages and Indian English . they also compile a benchmark for Indian language NLU to evaluate their results . |
| Outcome: | The monolingual corpora contains 8.8 billion tokens across all 11 languages and Indian English . the pre-trained language models are based on the compact ALBERT model . |
Discovering Canonical Indian English Accents: A Crowdsourcing-based Approach (L18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Automated Speech Recognition systems degrade in performance when recognizing accents that are different from the ones in training data. |
| Approach: | They propose to adapt Acoustic Models that are trained on one accent to a target accent by using a small amount of speech data in the target accent. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can be used to identify accents in Indian English and other languages. |
Artie Bias Corpus: An Open Dataset for Detecting Demographic Bias in Speech Applications (2020.lrec-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | A speech technology exhibits demographic bias when performance is worse for one demographic group relative to another. |
| Approach: | They create an English dataset of expert-validated audio, transcript> pairs with demographic tags for age, gender, accent and open software which may be used to detect demographic bias in Automatic Speech Recognition systems. |
| Outcome: | The Artie Bias Corpus is a curated subset of the Mozilla Common Voice corpus, which is released under a Creative Commons CC0 license . |
On Construction of the ASR-oriented Indian English Pronunciation Dictionary (2020.lrec-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Indian English (IE) has distinctive characteristics, especially phonologically, from other varieties of English. |
| Approach: | They build a small IE spontaneous speech corpus and use a linguistically-guided IE pronunciation dictionary to apply it to IE. |
| Outcome: | The proposed system performs better on IE spontaneous speech data than the one trained with CMUdict. |
Lost in Simulation: LLM-Simulated Users are Unreliable Proxies for Human Users in Agentic Evaluations (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Agentic benchmarks rely on LLM-simulated users to evaluate agent performance . however, the robustness, validity, and fairness of this approach remain unexamined . |
| Approach: | They investigate whether LLM-simulated users are reliable proxies for real human users . they find that agent success rates vary up to 9 percentage points across different LLMs . |
| Outcome: | The results show that simulated users underestimate success on challenging tasks while miscalibrate performance on moderately difficult tasks. |